News zu Ghosthunter, Ghosthunting, Geisterjäger, Geisterjagd, Mystery, Paranormales - Der Blog für Themen u.a. von TomsTalkMystery sowie News, Berichte, Serien, Bilder, Videos, die besprochen, vorgestellt und beäugt werden. Rundum alles, was die "Paranormal Community" betrifft. Zudem betreibe ich meinen eigenen YouTube-Mystery-Channel (TomsTalk Mystery)
Nun ja, aber so langsam an beschleicht mich das Gefühl, dass das Nachdenken und logischer Sachverstand für das Nachgehen von paranormalen Vorkommnissen, Prüfung von Bildern und Geistergeschichten eher zu einer Mangelware werden.
Ich finde das Bildungsniveau erschreckend niedrig... und noch erschreckender, wie Menschen, die sich für diese interessante Thematik des Paranormalen so für dumm verkauft werden. Egal ob es Geistergesichter im Feuer, Qualm oder Zigarettenrauch sind, Strichmännchen der Kinect, hallende Wortfetzen aus dem Portal...
Vor knapp vier Jahren hatte ich mal meine persönliche Meinung zu Para Ink geschrieben (Link). An meiner kritischen Meinung hat sich nicht viel geändert. Warum dann nun dieses Kurzfazit? Deswegen:
Seitens eines Bekantnen wurde ich auf verschiedene Szenen aus einer neuen Episode (Link) aufmerksam gemacht, darunter u.a. 48:25 / 1:15:00 / 1:26:00
Ich hab mir mal das Video am Anfang und Ende sowie zu den angegebenen Zeiten angeschaut und es
ist mehr als erschreckend, nein es ist sogar widerwärtig und
gewissenlos, wie PI mit einer Privatklientin umgeht. Wenn eine Klienten
wärend einer PU zusammenklappt, dann sollte der erste Schritt sein: Die Gesundheit der Klientin geht vor und notfalls sogar ärztliche Hilfe herbeiholen, denn man weiss nicht, was mit ihr ist. Aber stattdessen
wird draufgehalten, wie Gaffer, die an einer Unfallstelle vorbeifahren
und sich am Leid Dritter ergözen wollen. Hier zeigt sich, wie sehr die Gesundheit einer Klientin hinter der gebotenen Szenerie zurücksteht. Geht eben nur Klicks.
Bzgl. Ektoplasma... vollkommender Unsinn und man merkt mal wieder, dass man seitens dieses Formats sich nicht wirklich mit der Thematik beschäftigt.
Die Szenen sind ein Paradebeispiel für Gewissenlosigkeit und
Verantwortungslosigkeit, sollte alles zu 100% nicht gespielt sein (von
Klientenseite).
Seitens der Gruppierung wird ein völlig falsches Bild von der Realität vermittelt und man orientiert sich ganz offensichtlich zu viel an Hollywood und Supernatural.
Also die Rauchbilder, über die ich in diesem Artikel schreiben möchte, haben nichts, aber auch rein gar nichts mit den Rauchbildern zu tun, die auf eine Zeichentechnik aus der 2. Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts zurückgehen – Wikipedia hilft Euch dabei nicht weiter. Im Übrigen eine schöne Kunstform.
Nein, bei den hier zu besprechenden Rauchbildern handelt es sich um solche, die mittlerweile von manchen deutschen Ghosthunter-Teams produziert und als Ergebnisse einer „erfolgreichen paranormalen Ermittlung“ vorgestellt werden. Rauchbilder? Ghosthunter? Wie, was, wo? Okay, mal von Anfang an:
Vor einigen Jahren kam es im spirituellen und somit auch paranormalen Bereich in Mode, dass man Bilder von Rauch / Qualm aufnahm, da man der These anhängt, dass sich Geister im Rauch manifestieren und zeigen könnten (Konturen von Gesichtern – kurz sacken lassen, aber weiterlesen). Hieraus entwickelte sich ein Zweig im Ghosthunting bzw. spirituellen Bereich, wo man diesen Aufnahmen den allgemeinen Begriff von Rauchbildern gab. Seit wenigen Jahren werden von manchen Ghosthunter-Gruppierungen derartige Rauchbilder während der paranormalen Ermittlungen erstellt – hierbei wird gern auch auf E-Zigarettenqualm zurückgegriffen. Im aufgehellten Rauch, der separat beleuchtet wird, werden dann Gesichter erkannt. Auch kann man einen Spiegel hinter dem Aufnahmesetting positionieren, um evtl. Gesichter auch im „rückwärtigen“ Qualmbereich zu erkennen.
Um es nun kurz zu machen:
Rauchbilder sind reine Momentaufnahmen von eben Rauch, der auch je nach Hintergrund und Lichteinfalles unterschiedlich hellere Flächen und Schatten aufweist, die dabei flächen-, streifen- oder wirbel-/wellenartig sind und sich wiederum je nach Positionierung des Betrachters in sich verändern. Dies ist Fakt und jeder kann es einfach nachstellen. Wenn dann im Rauch auch Gesichter, Alf oder Teletubbies erkannt werden, ist dies kein Hexenwerk oder was Paranormales, sondern eine rein optische Täuschung, die man fachlich Pareidolie nennt, auch bekannt unter „Mustererkennung“. Hintergrund dieser optischen Täuschung ist die Tatsache, dass unser Gehirn alles in seinem Sichtbereich nach bekannten Konturen „scannt“. Gleiches Phänomen der optischen Täuschung wie bei dem Erkennen von Schafen, Teddybären usw. in Wolkenformationen. Es tritt ebenso wie bei Flammen, Busch- und Mauerwerk auf. Diese Tatsache der Mustererkennung wird von Anhängern der Rauchbildern ganz offensichtlich missachtet. Wenn zu der Rauchbild-Methode auch noch zugleich pseudowissenschaftliche Geräte wie die Ovilus oder Kinect zum Einsatz kommen und ihre „Pseudo-Geister“ antworten bzw. sich als Strichmännchen zeigen, dann machen sie die Rauchbild-Methode keinesfalls glaubwürdiger, sondern nüchtern betrachtet sind es einfach rein falsch-positive Ergebnisse, ohne jeglichen paranormalen Beweis. Über die nicht vorhandene Sinnhaftigkeit der genannten Geräte, so wie auch weiterer für paranormale Ermittlungen, hatte ich bereits in unterschiedlichen Podcasts und Artikeln schon geschrieben.
Dass einzig Sinnhafte an Rauchbildern können die zufällig zusammengekommenen Strukturen sein, die eine gewisse Kunst darstellen – aber für paranormale Ermittlungen lediglich eine Quelle von Fehldeutungsmöglichkeiten und allenfalls ideal, um Publikum zu unterhalten und Grusel mit fiktiven Geistern „zu verkaufen“.
Es
werden falsche Vorstellungen vermittelt, in dem man etwas vorgibt, was
realitätsfremd ist. An eine Wiedergeburt und Geister zu glauben
beinhaltet nicht, dass Geister-Strichmännchen auch zwangsläufig real
sind, nur weil das Mainstream-Ghosthunting es "vorgibt", wo
Pseudo-Experten dieses suggerieren.
Zudem wird "Rationalität"
für viele zum Schlagwort, um eine Seriösität und Professionalität zu
vermitteln, die sich aber durch die Nutzung von pseudowissenschaftlichen
Geräten, wie Kinect, PoltercomPico, Ovilus, Portal u.a. ad absurdum
geführt wird. Auch vertreten manche esoterische Thesen, die eher aus dem
Mittelalter stammen können, wo die Erkenntnisse der Naturwissenschaften
noch in den Kinderschuhen steckten. Und wo man an das Leben auf einer
flachen Erde glaubte - so manche Pseudo-Experten glauben das heute noch,
die u.a. die Erdkrümmung für eine optische Täuschung halten.
Die
an sich Leidtragenden sind Menschen, die sich zum einen für dieses
Thema interessieren und denen damit ein falsches Bild vermittelt wird,
aber besonders auch Menschen, die Ängste und Sorgen aufgrund von
Vorkommnissen in ihrem privaten Raum haben, für die sie at hoc keine
Erklärungen haben und man dann dank der sinnfreien Geräten
positiv-falsche Ergebnisse präsentiert.
In the last few weeks and months it has happened in abundance that private individuals contact me and our ghosthunter-team with questions about Kinect. On the one hand, the questions are based on pure interest and on the other hand because they were asked for a paranormal investigation with the help of the Kinect at home. Unfortunately, based on the "results", the groups then literally suggest ghosts and very often also evil ghosts or demons to the private persons. The result is fear and even more question marks among the people ... and for me personally an absolute no-go!
Briefly about the Kinect for those who do not know the device:
With the Kinect it is so that the XBox was developed to recognize two players in a limited playing field. Many infrared sensors are used here. In order for the software to recognize players via the sensors, tens of thousands of postures of the arms, legs and bodies of the human players had to be recorded and corresponding points had to be programmed. Only then can the Kinect "recognize" the players and connect prominent (programmed) points with lines. It should be noted: applies to living players - only then can they do it.
It is not programmed for ghosts ... we don't even know today what ghosts are really made of. So for the Kinect to be able to recognize the ghosts, one would have to have ghosts as "models", as in programming for living players, and record and feed in all postures ... and there is an essential problem...
The Kinect's sensors recognize any points and then connect them with lines. Any "stick figures" can be created, but this is not proof that there is a ghost! The Kinect software only connects dots with lines, nothing more! Therefore, a fidgety philippine or ghosts with 3 legs and 4 arms etc. often arise, etc. The Kinect is also only designed for a limited playing field of 2x3m or so (I would have to look for numbers) and for a "fixed playing field", ie the device must not be moved be = walking around with the device is excluded.
The light, infrared light, etc. can also interfere with the sensors and create points that are then connected. All in all, the Kinect is completely useless for ghosthunting. Unfortunately, many teams believe this because TV series "exemplify" this ...
But now we are at an essential point, namely that many groups use this useless part and can cause a lot of harm, especially for those seeking help. By the way, TV shows do it because they often suggest "real ghost" discoveries by means of the device ... Shaking the head ... but the quota has to be right.
Of course, objections would now arise that you could have different opinions about the device ... you can also, as you can be with the chemtrails, but you still have to stick to facts and these justify, as with the chemtrails that the Kinect is more useful for ghosthunting if you want to declare their stick figures as "real ghosts" ....
Therefore, urgent advice to those seeking help that they should pay attention to whether groups declare the results of the Kinect as real ghosts, if so: Keep your hands off them, otherwise you will have a ghost clubhouse with you after using the Kinect ... .
The fact that the Kinect is still experiencing a hype also shows, in an insane way, that many groups do not deal with the topic and equipment in any way ... and then they think that they could provide help with people who often also have fears. A dangerous paradox.
If you are in the paranormal community, you inevitably run into pictures with so-called orbs. Orbs are supposed to be souls / spirits of the deceased ... but is this really so?
According to esotericists, medials (Mz. Medium) and many ghosthunters or paranormal investigators from home and abroad, this is the case. But is this really the case or does inexperience, ignorance and a lot of wishful thinking play a role?
I think so ... because with all understanding that one would like to experience paranormal or record it on photo and video, one must always keep in mind that about 95% of all incidents can be explained rationally and are very often interpreted as paranormal, because those affected and also many paranormal investigators / ghosthunters have their knowledge from TV / YouTube series and esoteric sites, but often the rational is completely disregarded. Even esotericists, who are sure to label themselves as seers, mediums, etc. help ensure that incidents that can be rationally explained are reinterpreted as paranormal and play their "expert" card and thus lead to results that are unrealistic. Unfortunately, "media" have a certain status due to various TV series and many in the paranormal community feel tempted to believe such a medium more, although any medium can name itself. Whether they really can ... they owe the evidence and there are an immense number of fools among them; to date there is no medium that was 100% correct. I wrote about this in the article that I link here (LINK).
But now to the actual topic of orbs:
The orbs hype came from the USA and the sometimes very grotesque and exaggerated Ghosthunter series, mainly Ghost Adventures and various team videos by Ghosthunters. Orbs, on the other hand, were also mentioned in the series TAPS / Ghost Hunters (Jason Hawes - today with the continuation "Ghost Nation"), which was also broadcast here in Germany at the time, but not given any significant consideration, as they were always exposed as dust, insects and others rightly.
It has nothing to do with belief or different opinions if one speaks critically about orbs, but the fact that these "orbs" have nothing to do with spirits or souls at all, 99% of the time, as they are among other things can be explained rationally for purely physical reasons, which one should still be familiar with from school. Unfortunately, these explanations are hidden and esotericists and some colleagues who are not part of the team in particular tend to suggest unrealistic explanations for those looking for help - it is fundamentally forgotten that those looking for help turn to these people with confidence and put their physical and mental health in their hands, which unfortunately is not uncommon is exploited and they are told a real boom.
A few months ago my team colleague Hagen wrote an interesting article on the subject of orbs, which I would like to quote here:
"A little digression on the subject of" Orbs " Many fans of the paranormal and also many ghosthunters are always very excited when they discover an "orb" in your recordings. For them it is definitely a supernatural phenomenon. 99.9% of them are not ghosts, souls or something. These "orbs" are a completely natural phenomenon. You can even reproduce it at any time. Each of you can photograph thousands of orbs at home. But that doesn't mean that you have thousands of ghosts in your home. But that it is an everyday, physically explainable effect. This effect is also known as the "blur circle" in "professional" photography. This occurs when a very small object such as raindrops, grains of dust, dust particles or insects are between the object to be photographed and the camera and is then flashed. The camera is focused on the more distant object, but the small particle is closer to the lens and is therefore out of focus. Anyone who has taken a photo with their mobile phone should be familiar with this effect. If you want to photograph an object that is, for example, 5 meters away, but places some object very close to the cell phone and partly records it, then this object appears very blurred. Because the camera focused on the object at a distance of 5 meters. Back to the "Orb". So we're photographing an object and have a tiny particle floating or flying near the lens between the lens and the object. The flash light now brightens this small, blurred object extremely (because it is close to the flash and the bliz is set to the more distant object). This creates a blurred, glowing circle on the photo. This is a completely normal, physically explainable and unspectacular effect that can be adjusted at any time. Every photographer who can call himself that because he knows how his camera works knows this effect and tries to take it into account in a photo. But many "ghost fans" use a camera and apparently have no (basic) knowledge of how to use a camera properly. Terms like "depth of field" should also be known. Likewise, the effect that using a flash on a nearby object darkens the background. Otherwise they would actually know this effect. Of course, it is much more exciting to define this object as an "orb", a "spirit". Especially if you have no idea how to use a camera. Even our IR emitters, which are basically a kind of "continuous flash light", can create this effect. Because they generate very bright light in the infrared range. That's why you see these flying points of light very often on IR images. These are just small flies that are so small that you can't see them with the naked eye. Exactly because of the blurring problem explained above. We look at our surroundings and focus our eyes on objects that are meters away. However, these mini-flies get into the blurred area when they are close enough that they can be seen with the naked eye. So we don't see them. Unless our eyes would use flashlight. So how can we create our own orbs? Just throw some flour into the air in a dark room, take a step back and then take a photo with a flash. Voila .. thousands of ghosts and lost souls in your kitchen. As I said, this effect has been known since there was photography with flash. It has nothing to do with the supernatural. It can be easily reproduced and it proves that it is not a supernatural phenomenon. Serious Ghosthuntig work should try to rule out ALL naturally explainable effects before shooting yourself in at a ghost. Since these fuzzy circles are verifiably and verifiably 99% responsible for these orb effects, a lot has to play a role before it can be mentioned as a "ghost". If you want to use a tool, you should be familiar with it. This also applies to the "Camera" tool. It becomes interesting when you photograph a glowing circle without a flash and it does not fly by directly in front of an IR illuminator but still "lights up". Because then you can exclude a glow by "illuminating". But even then there are still fireflies, etc., which one would have to exclude first. To show that this is a completely natural and well-known phenomenon, here are a few links on the subject: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geisterfleck http://digicam-experts.de/wissen/17"
But now to the one percent where you could really speak of a real orb:
Recordings with "orbs" may only be of interest to me and require a closer examination if they shine clearly through their own energy (similar to a small ball lightning - visualized). This means that the object must not be brightened by any other light source (which, by the way, happens permanently with infrared recordings and therefore "orbs" cannot be found on infrared recordings per se).
Since I've been a ghosthunter (from 2010) there has only been one recording in all that time, where I can say that it may have been an orb that was recorded ... but even then I have to admit: You can not currently explaining it - nothing more.
At that time there was also activity on site in the house.
Speaking of activity: every phenomenon has to be checked for itself ... and just because one may have paranormal activities at home, recorded blurring circles are no proof of the presence of ghosts ...
By the way, our team is still available for examination orders (free of charge) of recorded material.
